Omkar Khadamkar Work with me

Work in progress · updated 8 Oct 2026 · a hypothesis, not a finding

What I'm learning in the open
Discarded · first sketch

Discarded: early ideas for the incident space

Ideas I tried for a 3D incident view, and why each one was dropped. Kept so the reasoning stays visible.

For exampleThe test for every idea was the same: does the third axis carry something a flat view can't, and does it put people, clocks and consequences in view, the way the afternoon on the home page does?

The current note is here. This page is a scrapbook, and search engines are asked to skip it.

The first sketch, discarded 8 Oct 2026 · a made-up incident, synthetic data

Drag to turn it. Hover a pearl to read the step. From above, it is the table below.

+1:10
The same incident as a grid. Rows up to the scrubber are marked as happened.
TimeAssetWhat happened
+0:00MailA finance user opens a fake invoice.
+0:04LaptopA macro runs and reaches out to an unknown server.
+0:19IdentityThe user's sign-in token is reused from a new device.
+0:27Laptop · alertAn alert fires on the laptop. Nobody acts on it yet.
+0:42File serverShared finance folders are listed and copied.
+1:05Cloud storage1.2 GB leaves for a storage account outside the company.

What this cannot show yet: a team looking at it together (claim B), a headset or a room, a real incident or real data, more than five assets, and whether it helps at all. That is what the test below is for.

Why it matters

Dropped work is still evidence. It shows which uses of 3D failed the test and why, so the next idea doesn't repeat them.

What I'm trying

What would show it works

Nothing on this page is being tested. The test runs on the current note.

Next step

None here. The current note is "An incident you can walk through".

Related work

Nothing here is for sale until a page proves it.Next: Letting an agent act alone